|
|
2-21-2007
The British are coming!
Jim Atwell
Great news for Fly Creek
and the surrounds! Barbara
and Michael Thrower, English
friends who haven't visited
Fly Creek in the present
millennium, are coming over
in early spring.
I hope all our snow won't
be gone by then. Michael's
cross-country skis and boots
are still stored in our garage.
(They're easily distinguished
from Anne's and mine; Michael's
boots look only slightly
shorter than his skis.) But
even without snow, we'll
have lots to show them and
lots of places to take them.
Of course they will want
to visit our jointly owned
property up the valley. At
the time of purchase, Michael
claimed that it was his
first step towards reclaiming
the Colonies for the Motherland.
And I suspect he describes
his American holdings,
not in prosaic Fly Creek
Valley, but in the charming
Vale of Phleigh.
I don't mean to suggest
that Michael is pompous or
dogmatic (though I do love it
when an exasperated Barbara
says, "Oh, Mike, do put a
sock in it!") Rather, Michael,
a very witty man, loves to
project the distant, patronizing
tone that he believes
Americans expect of Brits.
But in fact we all know
that the cool, distant Englishman,
though legendary,
is really in part a caricature,
as is the opposing image: the
glad-handing, back-slapping
American who forces familiarity
on everyone he meets,
even complete strangers.
(The worst example of that,
by the way, is the cynical
telephone salesman who
tries to disarm you by using
your nickname. He mocks
real friendship and, insultingly,
presumes that you're
sucker enough to fall for the
ploy. My corrective: Tell him
off, then cut him off.)
Of course, most Americans
aren't glad-handing
back-slappers. But a caricature
always has some basis
in fact. And perhaps, anxious
to prove our common touch,
we do come down a bit heavy
on folksy familiarity.
There's also a basis in fact
for the stereotype of British
reserve. I find that, in general,
Brits do hold themselves
a bit distant until they
know with whom they're
dealing. When they accept
you, however, they're as
warm and welcoming as any
people I've met.
Michael Thrower himself
is a great student of social interaction
and loves to lecture
me on how Brits and Yanks
differ in it. He has me noticing,
for instance, that Brits
are careful to avoid eye contact
with a passing stranger.
That's out of respect, Michael
says, for the stranger's right
to privacy. I tell him you see
the same thing in American
city streets and subways,
though we're just trying to
avoid enraging some wacko
and getting attacked.
Not the same thing at all,
says Michael dismissively,
and tells me to watch closely
when I amble through Chichester,
the lovely old cathedral
town where he and Barbara
live. Sure enough, most
people walking the busy
streets studiously avoid eye
contact. Indeed, they move
along with a focused preoccupation,
as if they were mentally
rehearsing the items on
their shopping lists or perhaps
composing haikus in
their heads. They don't look
aloof, only very busy with
their own thoughts. If you
must interrupt one to ask directions,
"I beg your pardon"
seems quite apt.
British strangers, continues
Michael, with a firm tone
only partly feigned, normally
don't speak to one another
without cause. The exception
is on Boxing Day afternoon,
when they're out walking off
a heavy holiday meal (this
after a still heavier one the
day before, on Christmas.)
Then, says Michael, it's not
improper to say, "Good day"
to passing strangers. It's fellow-
feeling, you see, promoted
by the holiday and perhaps
by a shared sense of
bloat from too much food.
But I've spotted another
exception to the aloofness
rule - and, I might add,
without my old friend's help.
(You saw an example of it
here last month when I described
the odd old gent and
dog met on our South Downs
hike.) This exception permits
English strangers to talk to
one another, though only indirectly.
It follows on Brits'
lavish sentimentality about
animals of all sorts. (An especially
outraged Victorian
once roared, "I'd kill any man
I saw beating a fallen horse!")
The exception works this
way: If a stranger approaches
with a dog on a leash, it's
perfectly proper for a second
Englishman to speak to him
- but only through the dog.
"Well, what a good little
fellow you are," says the second
man, smiling and crouching
by the animal. "You and
your master are enjoying a
good, brisk walk, are you?"
"Indeed we are," says the
other man (looking affectionately
at the dog - and speaking
for him,) "though my poor
master gets a bit winded on
the steeper hills."
"Well, you'll just help and
pull him along, won't you?"
says the second man, patting
the dog's head. "There's a
good dog."
"Thank you sir, I'll do my
best, I will," says the first
man, or, I should say, the
dog. "And a good day to you
from both of us."
"And the same to both of
you, doggie." And then the
strangers part, privacy still
intact, without once having
looked eye to eye.
Now, how's that, Michael,
for social interaction observed?
You're deft, you British!
But then, you've had lot
more centuries to practice
than we have.
And in spring, friends,
you may see me walking with
a man about my age and
height, also bearded and bifocaled,
but better at baldness
than I am. That will be
Michael Thrower. Don't hesitate
to look him in the eye
and say, "Welcome!" He expects
that of us. He'll be delighted.
Read about Jim Atwell's
book, "From Fly Creek - Celebrating
Life in Leatherstocking
Country" at JimAtwell.
com.
|
|
|