|
|
1-17-2008
Another
housing
proposal
offered
By JIM AUSTIN
Editor
Joseph Galati has proposed another approach
for the development of housing on the
former railroad right-of-way that runs parallel
to Grove Street.
In a letter to the mayor and planning board
Wednesday, Galati proposed the creation of coordinated
development district for the 2.2
acres. The only other coordinated development
district in the village is the Fernleigh development.
According to the zoning law, a coordinated
development district may be used for developments
like multi-family residential groups, institutional
complexes and others that may not
be feasible within the framework of the zoning
law. It offers greater flexibility in the type, layout
and design of buildings.
"It gives everybody a bridge to cross over
together. It seems like the most productive
way to proceed," Galati said Wednesday afternoon.
Galati had originally proposed residential
development for the land, and sought a change
from its current commercial zone to an R-3
residential zone. When that proposal stalled,
he switched to a motel, which requires a special
use permit from the board of trustees.
Most recently, he suggested if the motel was
not approved that he was considering a restaurant,
parking lot and self-storage warehouse
units.
He currently has a proposal for a motel before
the planning board and an application for
the special use permit before the board of
trustees, but has maintained his desire to see
residential development on the property.
The planning board voted unanimously last
week to recommend a change in zoning from
commercial to residential for the property, in
response to a request from the board of trustees
asking the planning board to review the
village zoning map, and make any recommendations
for change that they feel are necessary.
"If this (residential development) is what
we feel is the best use of the area, we should
say so. Other uses are problematic. To me it's
a no-brainer," planning board member Charles
Hill said last week.
In his letter to the board, Galati said he
now believes a change to a residential zone
may be "problematic for all parties, those being
the Leatherstocking Railway Historical
Society, the village of Cooperstown and JAG
Associates."
Galati is under contract to purchase the
property, but it still belongs to the Railway Society.
If the village agrees to work toward the goal
of a coordinated development district, Galati
said he will suspend all of his current and future
applications for commercial development,
but not relinquish his right to do so.
He would like to work with the village to
create ground level housing similar in size to
the 18 three-bedroom units he originally proposed.
The architectural design and site plan
would not compromise the character of the immediate
neighborhood, his letter stated.
"I will give you my personal commitment to
develop the vacant properties on Grove Street
to the most beneficial use for the people of the
village of Cooperstown, not
only in functionality, but also
in aesthetics," he wrote.
Planning board member
Charles Hill said Wednesday
afternoon he had not seen
Galati's letter yet, but believes
the planning board would seriously
consider any proposal. A
coordinated development district
has both advantages and
disadvantages, he said, but
the board can consider only
one proposal at a time.
The board of trustees has
scheduled a special meeting
for Friday at 9 a.m. for the
adoption of a required election
resolution, but also intends to
discuss the State Environmental
Quality Review Act and
the process of rezoning property.
|
|
|